HEADLINE: Village Wants Hasidic Public School District
BYLINE: By ELIZABETH KOLBERT, Special to The New
York Times
DATELINE:KIRYAS
JOEL, N.Y., July 20
BODY: After
years of battling local school officials over how far they should go to
accommodate religious beliefs, this Hasidic village has come up with a bold
plan: to create its own public school district serving only Hasidic children.
Residents, who already send nearly all of their children
to religious academies, say they have no intention of setting up a full public
school system. Instead, they argue, creating a new district would allow them to
obtain state funds to educate their children who are mentally or physically
handicapped without sending them to nearby public schools that they find
alien.
Politically, there is little opposition to the
plan, which was approved by the State Legislature this month and is awaiting
action by Gov. Mario M. Cuomo. But the plan may raise fundamental legal
questions.
Many legal experts, who say there are few
precedents for the measure, contend that it strains and possibly even violates
the constitutional limits on the relationship between church and state. And
groups ranging from the American Jewish Congress to the New York State Education
Department have urged Governor Cuomo to veto it.
''What
you are in effect setting up is a school district established along religious
lines,'' said Marc D. Stern, a lawyer for the American Jewish Congress. ''It may
well be unconstitutional. It is also very bad precedent.''
If the Governor approves the bill, Mr. Stern said, ''every ethnic group
in the state could go to the Legislature and say we want a separate school
district. There are parts of New York where you would have Polish schools,
Haitian schools, Puerto Rican schools.''
The district
would not bar students who are not Hasidic, but all of Kiryas
Joel's 8,000 residents are Hasidic. The village, in Orange County about 50
miles north of Manhattan, was carved out of the town of Monroe more than a
decade ago. And the move to create a separate school district here is the latest
in a battle over the education of physically and mentally handicapped
children that is almost as old as the village itself.
At the heart of the dispute is the question of how far the public
school system is obliged to go to accommodate students' religious and cultural
differences.
Officials of the Monroe-Woodbury school
district, which serves Kiryas Joel, have argued that the
village's handicapped children, estimated to number anywhere from 100 to
300, must attend special programs in the public schools and must be integrated
as much as possible into regular school programs.
Special Dress and Customs
But parents have
refused to send their children into the public schools, asserting that the
children's special dress and customs would make them outcasts in the schools.
Instead, they have pressed for special education programs to be provided at a
''neutral site,'' a building that is neither a regular public school nor a
religious school and where no religious education could take place.
In the meantime, parents have kept these children out of
the public schools, trying to provide the special services they need through
tutors, therapists sent to the village by the school district, and other
means.
Last year, the battle went before New York's
highest court, the Court of Appeals, which ruled that while the district could
provide the programs at a neutral site, it could not be compelled to do so. The
school district continued to insist that the children attend public school.
'In Dire Need of Education'
Since then, residents in both Kiryas Joel and the
surrounding communities have been fighting for a separate district.
''We've tried every other game in town to resolve this
issue,'' said Abraham Wieder, who has led the fight for a separate district and
whose daughter suffers from a severe hearing loss. ''These handicapped
children are in dire need of education.''
Parents in Kiryas Joel have pledged that the school for the
handicapped children would be run in accordance with state law, meaning
that despite Hasidic tradition, boys and girls would be taught together. The
children in the special education school would be eligible for state education
aid; the children in the religious schools would not.
Officials of the local school district, weary of the legal skirmishes,
have enthusiastically endorsed the plan for a new district.
''It's a practical solution to a unique set of circumstances,'' the
assistant superintendent of the Monroe-Woodbury school district, Terrence Olivo,
said. ''Everyone will come out ahead.'' The battle over the handicapped
children is not the only issue that has divided Kiryas Joel
and the rest of the school district. Three years ago the village sued the
district to provide male bus drivers to transport its boys to school; religious
law prohibits them from traveling with female drivers. Since a Federal court
ruled for the district, boys have since walked to school or been driven by their
parents.
Supporters of the plan argue that it would not
create a school district for a religious group but rather for a municipality. In
1977, after residents ran afoul of local zoning laws, Kiryas
Joel was incorporated as its own village.
Particularly Vigilant
Many legal experts
question whether a Kiryas Joel school district could withstand
a constitutional challenge. Even though Kiryas Joel is its own
village, they point out, the planned formation of the school district is
motivated by religion, not geography. And the United States Supreme Court,
experts note, has been particularly vigilant in enforcing the separation of
church and state in public schools.
''We strongly
suspect that both the purpose and the primary effect of creating a separate
school district for the village of Kiryas Joel is the
promotion of religion in violation of the establishment clause'' of the
Constitution, said Donna Lieberman, the associate director of the New York Civil
Liberties Union, which has filed a memorandum in opposition to the measure.
Lawrence Tribe, a professor at Harvard Law School, said
that while the new school district was ''certainly not automatically
unconstitutional,'' it did raise constitutional questions.
Mr. Tribe said that there were few court precedents for the measure and
that they left open the question of its legality. In one case, for example, the
Supreme Court ruled that Amish children, because of their religion, could not be
required to attend high school. In another case, a Federal court in Oregon ruled
that a city in the state, Rajneeshpuram, formed by a religious sect, was
invalid.
Political Pressure
It is Governor Cuomo's policy not to comment on bills that are before
him, and a spokesman, Gary Fryer, said today that the Governor declined to say
whether he would approve the new district. By law, he must act on the measure by
next week.
Mr. Cuomo is under significant political
pressure from the Hasidic communities here and in Brooklyn - which send
thousands of voters to the polls at election time - to approve the new district.
But he is also under heavy pressure from his own Education Department to veto
it.
''To segregate children based on ethnic, religious
and cultural lines is very destructive in a society where people have to live
together,'' said Karen Norlander, a lawyer for the State Education Department.
''It's a very troubling thought that any school district would be proposed along
such insular lines.''
Officials at the Education
Department say that they agree with residents of Kiryas Joel that
their handicapped children should not be forced to attend public schools but
should be able to receive an education at a neutral site. The answer to the
village's problems, they say, lies in working with the local school district,
not in separating from it.
''We don't work out
differences by creating walls,'' Ms. Norlander said. ''This is the least
acceptable route to solving the problem.''
GRAPHIC: photos of a shopping center in Kiryas
Joel, N.Y.; Terrence Olivo (NYT/Eddie Hausner) (pg. B4)