Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: kiryas joel, handicapped
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 10 of 10.

Copyright 1993 St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Inc.  
St. Louis Post-Dispatch (Missouri)

July 17, 1993, SATURDAY, FIVE STAR Edition

SECTION: EDITORIAL; Pg. 6B

LENGTH: 370 words

HEADLINE: SPECIALIZED SEGREGATION

BODY:
Nearly 40 years after the U.S. Supreme Court outlawed the doctrine of separate but equal in public schools, the issue is still bouncing around the courts. The latest decision highlights a particularly tough question: Can parents who want a separate school to deal with special problems expect tax money to pay for it? New York state's highest court said no, but the issues of the case are not about to go away. In 1989, responding to a request by Hasidic Jews in the village of Kiryas Joel, the New York Legislature set up a special tax-supported school district for handicapped children. The parents had not wanted to send their children to regular public schools for religious reasons. But by a vote of 4-2, the New York Court of Appeals struck down the plan last week. Judge George Bundy Smith said the move to "insulate" the Jewish students "inescapably conveys a message of governmental endorsement of religion." With religion involved, the answer to the separate-school dilemma may seem clear. But what about other cases of special schools supported with public money? Schools for black males, Hispanics, gays and other groups have been proposed or begun. Supporters often say such arrangements are a last-ditch attempt to teach students who have failed to thrive in a regular classroom setting. Opponents criticize such efforts on two grounds. First, they are an unwelcome return to the segregation that governments have tried to wipe out for nearly four decades; second, public money is best used for programs that benefit everyone, not members of any particular group to the exclusion of all others. Specialized schools are nothing new. In desegregation programs, magnet schools have been particularly helpful in attracting white students to attend predominantly black urban districts. But those schools are organized by specialized academics, a classification more appropriate for education than race, religion, sex or other categories. Public schools are designed to help create a common culture, not to emphasize and aggravate divisions. Those divisions exist, and they must be acknowledged and addressed. But fragmenting public schools into specialized segments is the wrong approach to take.

LOAD-DATE: October 11, 1993




Previous Document Document 10 of 10.
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2004 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.